令亨利·庞加莱忧心
让历史迷思的 俄国数学天才佩雷尔曼

Elusive Proof
Elusive Prover
A New Mathematical Mystery
Grisha Perelman
 

破解龐加萊猜想的佩雷爾曼

俄國數學天才佩雷爾曼(Grisha Perelman)2002-2003年間寫出破解龐加萊猜想的神來之筆,震驚數學界。很多人認為他是本屆菲爾茲獎的熱門人選,並會得到克雷數學所(Clay Mathematics Institute)為此猜想而懸賞的百萬美元大獎。
佩雷爾曼在互聯網上公佈他的三篇文章之前,已有八年沒有發表論文。在90年代初,他曾到美國做學術訪問,也曾有美國大學給他教職,但他還是回到俄羅斯的一個數學研究所工作。他寒窗枯坐破解龐加萊猜想期間的生活來源部分來自於他在美國訪問期間的些許積蓄。
佩雷爾曼的文章在互聯網公佈後,他沒有向正規雜誌投稿,對榮譽和獎金也沒有興趣。在此之前,他就曾拒絕歐洲數學學會對於他在90年代的工作而給予的獎勵。論文公佈後,他曾於2003年到美國作短暫的講解,其間拒絕記者的採訪和拍照。之後返回俄羅斯銷聲匿跡,對於《自然》、《科學》等著名雜誌的採訪置之不理。
本屆國際數學家大會邀請他演講,他也不予回復。
《自然》、《科學》等雜誌曾報導過佩雷爾曼的工作。日前《紐約時報》和《華爾街日報》均報道了佩雷爾曼的成就和他迷一樣的個性。《紐約時報》8月15日報道的題目是:Elusive Proof, Elusive Prover: A New Mathematical Mystery --- Grisha Perelman, where are you? 不可捉摸的證明,不可捉摸的證明者:一個新的數學之謎 --- 佩雷爾曼,你在哪裡? 本文給出了解答:這位數學隱士目前失業在家,和母親一起靠著母親每月30英鎊的退休金相依為命。
佩雷爾曼的成就無疑將銘刻在數學的神殿,可是他卻認為自己不值得被世界矚目。一簞食、一瓢飲、居陋巷,走入學問的桃花源,可是這位數學隱士目前如此困頓的處境令人感歎。
据英國週日電訊報(The Sunday Telegraph)8月20日的獨家報道,一位可能會拒絕百萬美元大獎的數學天才目前和母親住在聖彼得堡的一個簡陋公寓裡,兩人靠母親每月30英鎊的退休金相依為命,這是因為他自去年十二月以來一直失業。
英國週日電訊報近日追蹤到這位特立獨行的隱士。他因破解了一個被稱為龐加萊猜想的百年難題而震驚數學世界。
佩 雷爾曼(Grigory "Grisha" Perelman)的困境來源於發生在2003年他和著名的斯特克羅夫研究所(Steklov Institute)的不歡而散。他的一位朋友說,當這個位於聖彼得堡的研究所沒有繼續讓他當選為會員時,現年40歲的佩雷爾曼傷心的離去,他覺得自己是一個絕對沒有天賦和才氣的人。他信心崩潰,離群索居。
其他的朋友說他無法支付去國際數學家大會的費用。這個四年一度的大會本周在馬德里舉行,他的數學同行們認為他應該獲得菲爾茲獎---
數學界的諾貝爾獎。他的朋友說他過於謙虛,不會要任何人幫助支付旅費。
上周在聖彼得堡接受採訪時,佩雷爾曼堅持說他不值得所有這些注目,他對這些從天而降的好運也沒有興趣。「我不認為我說的任何話可以對公眾引起些微的興趣,」 他說,「我這麼說不是因為我看重我的隱私或者我在做什麼我想隱瞞的事情。這裡沒有進行什麼高度機密的項目。我只是相信公眾對我沒有任何興趣。」
他接著說:「我知道自我推崇的事情大量發生,如果人們這樣做,我希望他們好運,但是我不認為這是件好事。很久以前我就認識到這一點,沒有人能夠改變我的想法。報紙應該更加注意他們應該報導誰。他們應該有更好的品味。對於我來說,我無法給他們的讀者提供任何東西。」
「我不是因為和媒體有任何負面的經歷,即使他們胡說什麼我的父親是一位著名的物理學家。我只是完全不想在意別人怎麼寫我的事。」
佩雷爾曼博士在做講師時存了一點點錢,但是他好像不太情願得到克雷數學所懸賞的一百萬美元的獎金。這個位於美國麻州劍橋的數學所懸賞了七個世紀數學難題,佩雷爾曼破解了其中的龐加萊猜想。
龐加萊猜想最先是由法國數學家龐加萊(Jules Henri Poincare)於1904年提出的,這個猜想是關於三維形狀的問題。
朋友們說,佩雷爾曼內在的謙虛表現在他在工作十年之後終於破解了龐加萊猜想後,他只是把他的計算放在互聯網上,而沒有在有名望的雜誌發表他的解釋。「如果任何人對我的解答策略感興趣,它都在那裡了 --- 讓他們去讀它。」佩雷爾曼說,「我已經發表了我所有的計算。這是我能向公眾提供的。」
朋友們得知他和母親居住並沒有感到驚訝。這個猶太家庭還包括他的妹妹,依蓮娜,也是一位數學家。這個家庭一直很親密。一個叫若新(Sergey Rukshin)的朋友是聖彼得堡資優學生數學中心的主任。他在佩雷爾曼十幾歲的時候就發現了他的天賦。
16 歲時,佩雷爾曼在1982年國際數學奧林匹克競賽中以滿分42分的成績獲得金牌。他也是一個有天賦的小提琴手,他還打乒乓球。在聖彼得堡州立大學獲得博士後,佩雷爾曼博士開始在斯特克羅夫研究所(Steklov Institute)工作,該研究所是俄羅斯科學院的一部分。後來他到美國工作一段時間,之後於1996年又回到斯特克羅夫研究所。若新先生說,該研究所在三年前把佩雷爾曼拒之門外讓他非常難過。
儘管佩雷爾曼和若新仍然討論生命、音樂和文學,但是這兩位老朋友不再談論數學。若新說:「對於這位博士來說,這已經成了一個痛苦的話題。」
 
掷落浮名赢俊彦 今生莫问我是谁 玉宇深邃星万点 行云逝水天地间 佩雷尔曼赞  
 
人們不僅在爭奪自然資源,也在不懈的爭奪知識產權(包括衍生的榮譽感),更可怕的是人們正在揮霍應該留給後人的財富。
市場經濟讓人喘不過氣來,一來到這個世界,人們就訓練自己用最快的速度去瓜分社會財富。想起小農經濟那個年代。。。不提也罷。市場經濟比小農經濟優越的地方就是並不諱疾忌醫。
看看PERELMAN,閣下不覺得他破得了龐加萊猜想,卻不能理解人們如此瘋狂、如此不擇手段的去瓜分知識產權嗎?根據對等的哲學原理,我們能夠理解他嗎?
我們和他,誰的精神更健康?

古月語

 

Grigori Perelman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman
Born June 13, 1966 (1966-06-13) (age 41)
Leningrad, USSR
Field Mathematician
Known for Riemannian geometry and geometric topology
Notable prizes Fields Medal (2006), declined

Grigori Yakovlevich Perelman (Russian: Григорий Яковлевич Перельман), born 13 June 1966 in Leningrad, USSR (now St. Petersburg, Russia), sometimes known as Grisha Perelman, is a Russian mathematician who has made landmark contributions to Riemannian geometry and geometric topology. In particular, he has proved Thurston's geometrization conjecture. This solves in the affirmative the famous Poincaré conjecture, posed in 1904 and regarded as one of the most important and difficult open problems in mathematics.

In August 2006, Perelman was awarded the Fields Medal,[1] for "his contributions to geometry and his revolutionary insights into the analytical and geometric structure of the Ricci flow". The Fields Medal is widely considered to be the top honor a mathematician can receive. However, he declined to accept the award or appear at the congress.

On December 22, 2006, the journal Science recognized Perelman's proof of the Poincaré Conjecture as the scientific "Breakthrough of the Year," the first such recognition in the area of mathematics.[2]

Contents

[hide]

[edit] Early life and education

Grigori Perelman was born in Leningrad (now St. Petersburg) to a Jewish family on June 13, 1966. His early mathematical education occurred at the Leningrad Secondary School #239, a specialized school with advanced mathematics and physics programs. In 1982, as a member of the USSR team competing in the International Mathematical Olympiad, an international competition for high school students, he won a gold medal, achieving a perfect score.[3] In the late 1980s, Perelman went on to earn a Candidate of Science degree (the Russian equivalent to the Ph.D.) at the Mathematics and Mechanics Faculty of the Leningrad State University, one of the leading universities in the former Soviet Union. His dissertation was entitled "Saddle surfaces in Euclidean spaces". He is also a talented violinist and plays table tennis.[4]

After graduation, Perelman began work at the renowned Leningrad Department of Steklov Institute of Mathematics of the USSR Academy of Sciences. His advisors at the Steklov Institute were Aleksandr Danilovich Aleksandrov and Yuri Dmitrievich Burago. In the late 80s and early 90s, Perelman held posts at several universities in the United States. In 1992, he was invited to spend a semester each at New York University and Stony Brook University. From there, he accepted a two-year fellowship at the University of California, Berkeley in 1993. He was offered jobs at several top universities in US including Princeton and Stanford, but he rejected them all and returned to the Steklov Institute in the summer of 1995.

[edit] Geometrization and Poincaré conjectures

Until the autumn of 2002, Perelman was best known for his work in comparison theorems in Riemannian geometry. Among his notable achievements was the proof of the soul conjecture.

[edit] The problem

Main article: Poincaré conjecture

The Poincaré conjecture, proposed by French mathematician Henri Poincaré in 1904, was the most famous open problem in topology. Loosely speaking, the conjecture surmises that if a closed three-dimensional manifold is sufficiently like a sphere in that each loop in the manifold can be tightened to a point, then it is really just a three-dimensional sphere. The analogous result has been known to be true in higher dimensions for some time, but the case of three-manifolds had turned out to be the hardest of them all. Roughly speaking, this is because in topologically manipulating a three-manifold, there are too few dimensions to move "problematic regions" out of the way without interfering with something else.

In 1999, the Clay Mathematics Institute announced the Millennium Prize Problems – a one million dollar prize for the proof of several conjectures, including the Poincaré conjecture. There is universal agreement that a successful proof would constitute a landmark event in the history of mathematics, fully comparable with the proof by Andrew Wiles of Fermat's Last Theorem, but possibly even more far-reaching.

[edit] Perelman's proof

In November 2002, Perelman posted to the arXiv the first of a series of eprints in which he claimed to have outlined a proof of the geometrization conjecture, a result that includes the Poincaré conjecture as a particular case. See the Hamilton–Perelman solution of the Poincaré conjecture for a layman's description of the mathematics.

Perelman modifies Richard Hamilton's program for a proof of the conjecture, in which the central idea is the notion of the Ricci flow. Hamilton's basic idea is to formulate a "dynamical process" in which a given three-manifold is geometrically distorted, such that this distortion process is governed by a differential equation analogous to the heat equation. The heat equation describes the behavior of scalar quantities such as temperature; it ensures that concentrations of elevated temperature will spread out until a uniform temperature is achieved throughout an object. Similarly, the Ricci flow describes the behavior of a tensorial quantity, the Ricci curvature tensor. Hamilton's hope was that under the Ricci flow, concentrations of large curvature will spread out until a uniform curvature is achieved over the entire three-manifold. If so, if one starts with any three-manifold and lets the Ricci flow work its magic, eventually one should in principle obtain a kind of "normal form". According to William Thurston, this normal form must take one of a small number of possibilities, each having a different flavor of geometry, called Thurston model geometries.

This is similar to formulating a dynamical process which gradually "perturbs" a given square matrix, and which is guaranteed to result after a finite time in its rational canonical form.

Hamilton's idea had attracted a great deal of attention, but no one could prove that the process would not "hang up" by developing "singularities", until Perelman's eprints sketched a program for overcoming these obstacles. According to Perelman, a modification of the standard Ricci flow, called Ricci flow with surgery, can systematically excise singular regions as they develop, in a controlled way.

It is known that singularities (including those which occur, roughly speaking, after the flow has continued for an infinite amount of time) must occur in many cases. However, mathematicians expect that, assuming that the geometrization conjecture is true, any singularity which develops in a finite time is essentially a "pinching" along certain spheres corresponding to the prime decomposition of the 3-manifold. If so, any "infinite time" singularities should result from certain collapsing pieces of the JSJ decomposition. Perelman's work apparently proves this claim and thus proves the geometrization conjecture.

[edit] Verification

Since 2003, Perelman's program has attracted increasing attention from the mathematical community. In April 2003, he accepted an invitation to visit Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Princeton University, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Columbia University and Harvard University, where he gave a series of talks on his work.[3]

As John Lott said in ICM2006, "It has taken us some time to examine Perelman's work. This is partly due to the originality of Perelman's work and partly to the technical sophistication of his arguments. All indications are that his arguments are correct."

On 25 May 2006, Bruce Kleiner and John Lott, both of the University of Michigan, posted a paper on arXiv that fills in the details of Perelman's proof of the Geometrization conjecture.[5]

In June 2006, the Asian Journal of Mathematics published a paper by Xi-Ping Zhu of Sun Yat-sen University in China and Huai-Dong Cao of Lehigh University in Pennsylvania, giving a complete description of Perelman's proof of the Poincaré and the geometrization conjectures.[6] According to the Fields medalist Shing-Tung Yau "Cao and Zhu put the finishing touches to the complete proof of the Poincaré Conjecture"[7]. Cao has stated, "Hamilton and Perelman have done the most important fundamental works. They are the giants and our heroes. In my mind there is no question at all that Perelman deserves the Fields Medal. We just follow the footsteps of Hamilton and Perelman and explain the details. I hope everyone who read our paper would agree that we have given a rather fair account." [8]

On December 3, 2006, in response to plagiarism charges, Cao and Zhu retracted their original paper titled, “A complete proof of the Poincaré and geometrization conjectures — application of the Hamilton-Perelman theory of the Ricci flow” and renamed it more modestly, "Hamilton-Perelman's Proof of the Poincaré Conjecture and the Geometrization Conjecture." [9]. They also took the phrase "crowning achievement" out of the abstract.[9]

In July 2006, John Morgan of Columbia University and Gang Tian of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology posted a paper on the arXiv titled, "Ricci Flow and the Poincaré Conjecture." In this paper, they provide a detailed version of Perelman's proof of the Poincaré Conjecture.[10] On 24 August 2006, Morgan delivered a lecture at the ICM in Madrid on the Poincaré conjecture.[11]

The above work demonstrates that Perelman's outline can indeed be expanded into a complete proof of the geometrization conjecture.

Nigel Hitchin, professor of mathematics at Oxford University, has said that "I think for many months or even years now people have been saying they were convinced by the argument. I think it's a done deal."[12]

[edit] The Fields Medal and Millennium Prize

In May 2006, a committee of nine mathematicians voted to award Perelman a Fields Medal for his work on the Poincaré conjecture.[3] The Fields Medal is the highest award in mathematics; two to four medals are awarded every four years.

Sir John Ball, president of the International Mathematical Union, approached Perelman in St. Petersburg in June 2006 to persuade him to accept the prize. After 10 hours of persuading over two days, he gave up. Two weeks later, Perelman summed up the conversation as: "He proposed to me three alternatives: accept and come; accept and don’t come, and we will send you the medal later; third, I don’t accept the prize. From the very beginning, I told him I have chosen the third one." He went on to say that the prize "was completely irrelevant for me. Everybody understood that if the proof is correct then no other recognition is needed."[3]

On August 22, 2006, Perelman was publicly offered the medal at the International Congress of Mathematicians in Madrid, "for his contributions to geometry and his revolutionary insights into the analytical and geometric structure of the Ricci flow".[13] He did not attend the ceremony, and declined to accept the medal, making him the first person in history to decline this prestigious prize.[14][15]

He had previously turned down a prestigious prize from the European Mathematical Society,[15] allegedly saying that he felt the prize committee was unqualified to assess his work, even positively.[12]

Perelman may also be due to receive a share (or the totality) of a Millennium Prize. The rules for this prize - which can be changed, as stated by a member of the advisory board of the Clay Mathematics Institute - require his proof to be published in a peer-reviewed mathematics journal. While Perelman has not pursued publication himself, other mathematicians have published papers about the proof. This may make Perelman eligible to receive a share or the whole of a prize. Perelman has stated that "I’m not going to decide whether to accept the prize until it is offered."[3]

Terence Tao spoke about Perelman's work on the Poincare Conjecture during the 2006 Fields Medal Event [1]:

They [the Millennium Prize Problems] are like these huge cliff walls, with no obvious hand holds. I have no idea how to get to the top. [Perelman's proof of the Poincare Conjecture] is a fantastic achievement, the most deserving of all of us here in my opinion. Most of the time in mathematics you look at something that's already been done, take a problem and focus on that. But here, the sheer number of breakthroughs...well it's amazing.

[edit] Withdrawal from mathematics

As of the spring of 2003 Perelman no longer works in the Steklov Institute.[4] His friends are said to have stated that he currently finds mathematics a painful topic to discuss; some even say that he has abandoned mathematics entirely.[16] According to a recent interview, Perelman is currently jobless, living with his mother in St Petersburg.[4]

Although Perelman says in a The New Yorker article that he is disappointed with the ethical standards of the field of mathematics, the article implies that Perelman refers particularly to Yau's efforts to downplay his role in the proof and play up the work of Cao and Zhu. Perelman has said that "I can’t say I’m outraged. Other people do worse. Of course, there are many mathematicians who are more or less honest. But almost all of them are conformists. They are more or less honest, but they tolerate those who are not honest."[3] He has also said that "It is not people who break ethical standards who are regarded as aliens. It is people like me who are isolated."[3]

This, combined with the possibility of being awarded a Fields medal, led him to quit professional mathematics. He has said that "As long as I was not conspicuous, I had a choice. Either to make some ugly thing" (a fuss about the mathematics community's lack of integrity) "or, if I didn’t do this kind of thing, to be treated as a pet. Now, when I become a very conspicuous person, I cannot stay a pet and say nothing. That is why I had to quit.”[3]

[edit] Bibliography

  • Перельман, Григорий Яковлевич (1990). Седловые поверхности в евклидовых пространствах:Автореф. дис. на соиск. учен. степ. канд. физ.-мат. наук (in Russian). Ленинградский Государственный Университет.  (Perelman's dissertation)
  • Perelman, G.; Yu. Burago, M. Gromov (1992). "Aleksandrov spaces with curvatures bounded below". Russian Math Surveys 47 (2): 1-58. 
  • Perelman, G. (1994). "Proof of the soul conjecture of Cheeger and Gromoll". J. Differential Geom. 40: 209-212. 
  • Perelman, G. (1994). "Elements of Morse theory on Aleksandrov spaces". St. Petersbg. Math. J. 5 (1): 205-213. 
  • Perelman, G.Ya.; Petrunin, A.M. (1994). "Extremal subsets in Alexandrov spaces and the generalized Liberman theorem". St. Petersburg Math. J. 5 (1): 215-227. 

Perelman's proof of the geometrization conjecture:

[edit] Notes

  1. ^ Fields Medals 2006. International Mathematical Union (IMU) - Prizes. Retrieved on 2006-04-30.
  2. ^ The Poincaré Conjecture--Proved. BREAKTHROUGH OF THE YEAR (2006-12-22). Retrieved on 2006-12-29.
  3. ^ a b c d e f g h Naser and Gruber.
  4. ^ a b c Lobastova and Hirsh
  5. ^ Kleiner and Lott.
  6. ^ Cao and Zhu.
  7. ^ "Chinese mathematicians solve global puzzle", China View (Xinhua), 3 June 2006. 
  8. ^ "Interview with Huai-Dong Cao", ICM2006 Daily News, 29 August 2006. 
  9. ^ a b Huai-Dong Cao, Xi-Ping Zhu (December 3, 2006). "Hamilton-Perelman's Proof of the Poincaré Conjecture and the Geometrization Conjecture". arXiv:math. DG/0612069. 
  10. ^ Morgan and Tian.
  11. ^ Schedule of the scientific program of the ICM 2006
  12. ^ a b Randerson.
  13. ^ "Fields Medal - Grigory Perelman" (PDF), International Congress of Mathematicians 2006, 22 August 2006. 
  14. ^ Mullins.
  15. ^ a b "Maths genius declines top prize", BBC News, 22 August 2006. 
  16. ^ http://top.rbc.ru/index.shtml?/news/society/2006/08/22/22132425_bod.shtml

[edit] References

[edit] See also

[edit] External links


Persondata
NAME Perelman, Grigori Yakovlevich
ALTERNATIVE NAMES
SHORT DESCRIPTION Mathematician
DATE OF BIRTH June 13, 1966
PLACE OF BIRTH Leningrad, USSR
DATE OF DEATH
PLACE OF DEATH
 
参考资料: 歷史的迷思:破解龐加萊猜想的爭執 具有逼真記憶的POINCARE
 

巴中网站
http://www.boanson.net